Missed opportunities for treatment of inflammatory arthritis and factors associated with non-treatment: An observational cohort study in United States Veterans with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with non-treatment with biologic and non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during the 12 months after initial inflammatory arthritis (IA) diagnosis. METHODS: We identified Veterans with incident IA diagnosed in 2007-2019. We assessed time to treatment with Kaplan-Meier curves. We identified associations between non-treatment and factors relating to patients, providers, and the health system with multivariate Generalized Estimation Equation (GEE) log-Poisson. Subgroup analyses included IA subtypes (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and ankylosing spondylitis [AS]) and timeframes of the initial IA diagnosis (2007-11, 2012-15, and 2016-19). RESULTS: Of 18,318 study patients, 40.7 % did not receive treatment within 12 months after diagnosis. In all patients, factors associated with non-treatment included Black race (hazard ratio, 95 % confidence interval: 1.13, 1.08-1.19), Hispanic ethnicity (1.14, 1.07-1.22), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, (1.15, 1.11-1.20), and opiate use (1.09, 1.05-1.13). Factors associated with higher frequency of DMARD treatment included married status (0.86, 0.81-0.91); erosion in joint imaging report (HR: 0.86, 0.81-0.91); female diagnosing provider (0.90, CI: 0.85-0.96), gender concordance between patient and provider (0.91, CI: 0.86-0.97), and diagnosing provider specialty of rheumatology (0.53, CI: 0.49-0.56). CONCLUSION: A high proportion of Veterans with IA were not treated with a biologic or non-biologic DMARD within one year after their initial diagnosis. A wide range of factors were associated with non-treatment of IA that may represent missed opportunities for improving the quality of care through early initiation of DMARDs.

Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors compared to biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and renal impairment: the ANSWER cohort study.

Data on the safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with renal impairment are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the safety of JAKis compared to biological (b) DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and renal impairment. We used a multi-centre observational registry of patients with RA in Japan (the ANSWER cohort). We assessed the drug retention rates of b/targeted synthetic DMARDs with different modes of action (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), immunoglobulins fused with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4-Ig), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), and JAKis) in patients with RA stratified by pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The time to discontinuation of bDMARDs or JAKis was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model This study included 3775 patients, who were classified into three groups (the normal group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 2893 patients; CKDa group (eGFR 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 551; and CKDb group (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2): 331). In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to adverse events (AE) was the lowest in patients treated with JAKi (TNFi: 93.1%; IL-6Ri: 94.1%; CTLA-4-Ig: 92.3%; JAKi: 75.1%). In the normal and CKDa groups, drug retention rates due to AE were similar among patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKi. In contrast, drug retention rates due to inefficacy were similar between bDMARDs and JAKis in all groups. In the Cox-proportional model, in the CKDb group, TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA-4-Ig showed lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AE than JAKis (TNFi: hazard ratio = 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.61), IL-6Ri: 0.34 (0.14-0.81), CTLA-4-Ig: 0.36 (0.15-0.89)). JAKis showed the lowest drug retention due to AE in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe renal impairment (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Physicians should pay more attention to renal function when using JAKis than when using bDMARDs.

The fibroid phenotype of biological naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis are less likely to respond to anti-IL-6R treatment.

Type III collagen gene expression is upregulated in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presenting the fibroid phenotype. The soluble type III collagen formation biomarker, PRO-C3, is known to measure fibrogenesis in fibrotic diseases. In this exploratory study, we aimed to investigate the association between fibrogenesis (PRO-C3) and the disease- and treatment response in patients with RA. We measured PRO-C3 in subsets of two clinical trials assessing the effect of the anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor treatment tocilizumab (TCZ) as monotherapy or polytherapy with methotrexate. PRO-C3 levels had weak or very weak correlations with the clinical parameters (Spearman's). However, when the patients were divided into Disease Activity Score-28 groups characterized by the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), there was a statistical difference between the PRO-C3 levels of the different groups (p < 0.05). To determine the response in relation to PRO-C3, a cut-off based on PRO-C3 levels and patients in remission (DAS28-ESR ≤ 2.6) was identified. This showed that a reduction in PRO-C3 after treatment initiation was associated with decreased DAS28-ESR and a higher response rate in patients with low PRO-C3 levels than in those with high PRO-C3 levels. This indicates that a fibrotic component affects the responsiveness of patients.

Increasing the etanercept dose in a treat-to-target approach in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: does it help to reach the target? A post-hoc analysis of the BeSt for Kids randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept has been studied in doses up to 0.8 mg/kg/week (max 50 mg/week) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. In clinical practice higher doses are used off-label, but evidence regarding the relation with outcomes is lacking. We describe the clinical course of JIA-patients receiving high-dose etanercept (1.6 mg/kg/week; max 50 mg/week) in the BeSt for Kids trial. METHODS: 92 patients with oligoarticular JIA, RF-negative polyarticular JIA or juvenile psoriatic arthritis were randomised across three treat-to-target arms: (1) sequential DMARD-monotherapy (sulfasalazine or methotrexate (MTX)), (2) combination-therapy MTX + 6 weeks prednisolone and (3) combination therapy MTX + etanercept. In any treatment-arm, patients could eventually escalate to high-dose etanercept alongside MTX 10mg/m2/week. RESULTS: 32 patients received high-dose etanercept (69% female, median age 6 years (IQR 4-10), median 10 months (7-16) from baseline). Median follow-up was 24.6 months. Most clinical parameters improved within 3 months after dose-increase: median JADAS10 from 7.2 to 2.8 (p = 0.008), VAS-physician from 12 to 4 (p = 0.022), VAS-patient/parent from 38.5 to 13 (p = 0.003), number of active joints from 2 to 0.5 (p = 0.12) and VAS-pain from 35.5 to 15 (p = 0.030). Functional impairments (CHAQ-score) improved more gradually and ESR remained stable. A comparable pattern was observed in 11 patients (73% girls, median age 8 (IQR 6-9)) who did not receive high-dose etanercept despite eligibility (comparison group). In both groups, 56% reached inactive disease at 6 months. No severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred after etanercept dose-increase. In the comparison group, 2 SAEs consisting of hospital admission occurred. Rates of non-severe AEs per subsequent patient year follow-up were 2.27 in the high-dose and 1.43 in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation to high-dose etanercept in JIA-patients who were treated to target was generally followed by meaningful clinical improvement. However, similar improvements were observed in a smaller comparison group who did not escalate to high-dose etanercept. No SAEs were seen after escalation to high-dose etanercept. The division into the high-dose and comparison groups was not randomised, which is a potential source of bias. We advocate larger, randomised studies of high versus regular dose etanercept to provide high level evidence on efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register; NTR1574; 3 December 2008; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/26585 .

Paradoxical and bimodal immune-mediated dermatological side effects of TNF-α inhibitors: A comprehensive review.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing prevalence of immune-mediated diseases such as psoriasis, lichen planus, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologists have turned to new biologic drugs known as DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) in recent years. AREAS COVERED: In this study, we evaluate the immune-mediated dermatological side effects of DMARDS by reviewing and analyzing previous peer-reviewed research on the effects of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of skin diseases, as well as adverse effects of these drugs and some of the main causes of these effects. EXPERT OPINION: DMARDs are very effective in improving control of the above diseases. TNF-α inhibitors are an important group of DMARDs that are widely used. The paradoxical adverse events (PAEs) associated with the use of TNF-α inhibitors are divided into three categories: true paradoxical, borderline paradoxical, and non-paradoxical. True PAEs include conditions for which TNF-α inhibitors are approved for treatment. Borderline PAEs are considered to occur with this class of drugs for which there is no definite approval but for which there is sufficient evidence. Although these events are rare, early recognition of the accused drug and appropriate decision-making may prevent progression of complications and irreversible side effects.

Novel insights into the management of rheumatoid arthritis: one year in review 2024.

New evidence from 2023 has slightly shifted some perspectives on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Glucocorticoids have reaffirmed their role as bridging therapy, while novel studies on JAK inhibitors have examined efficacy, mechanism of action, and their potential in high-risk populations, bolstering our understanding with real-world data.Additionally, among treatment strategies, achieving low disease activity has emerged as comparable to achieving remission in the long term, and new insights have been gained regarding tapering both biological and conventional synthetic DMARDs. Furthermore, novel approaches have been proposed for managing difficult-to-treat RA and pre-RA. In this paper, the reviewers aim to present the most relevant studies published during the last year in the field of RA management.

The efficacy and safety of short-term and low-dose IL-2 combined with tocilizumab to treat rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: Immunotherapy targeting factors related to immune imbalance has been widely employed for RA treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 combined with tocilizumab (TCZ), a biologics targeting IL-6, in RA patients. Methods: Fifty adults with active RA who met the criteria with complete clinical data were recruited, and divided into three groups: control group (n=15), IL-2 group (n=26), and IL-2+TCZ group (n=9). In addition to basic treatment, participants in the IL-2 group received IL-2 (0.5 MIU/day), while participants in the IL-2+TCZ group received IL-2 (0.5 MIU/day) along with one dose of TCZ (8 mg/kg, maximum dose: 800 mg). All subjects underwent condition assessment, laboratory indicators and safety indicators detection, and records before treatment and one week after treatment. Results: Compared with the baseline, all three groups showed significant improvement in disease conditions, as evidenced by significantly reduced disease activity indicators. The low-dose IL-2 and combination treatment groups demonstrated a violent proliferation of Tregs, while the absolute number of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells in the latter group showed a decreasing trend. The decrease in the Th17/Treg ratio was more pronounced in the IL-2+TCZ groups. No significant adverse reactions were observed in any of the patients. Conclusion: Exogenous low doses of IL-2 combined TCZ were found to be safe and effective in reducing effector T cells and appropriately increasing Treg levels in RA patients with high effector T cell levels. This approach helps regulate immune homeostasis and contributes to the prevention of disease deterioration. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=13909, identifier ChiCTR-INR-16009546.

Association of systemic lupus erythematosus standard of care immunosuppressants with glucocorticoid use and disease outcomes: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the association of standard-of-care systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) medications with key outcomes such as low disease activity attainment, flares, damage accrual, and steroid-sparing, for which there is current paucity of data. METHODS: The Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) prospectively collects data across numerous sites regarding demographic and disease characteristics, medication use, and lupus outcomes. Using propensity score methods and panel logistic regression models, we determined the association between lupus medications and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1707 patients followed over 12,689 visits for a median of 2.19 years, 1332 (78.03%) patients achieved the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), 976 (57.18%) experienced flares, and on most visits patients were taking an anti-malarial (69.86%) or immunosuppressive drug (76.37%). Prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine were utilised with similar frequency across all organ domains; methotrexate for musculoskeletal activity. There were differences in medication utilisation between countries, with hydroxychloroquine less frequently, and calcineurin inhibitors more frequently, used in Japan. More patients taking leflunomide, methotrexate, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid were taking ≤ 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone (compared to > 7.5 mg/day) suggesting a steroid-sparing effect. Patients taking tacrolimus were more likely (Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] 13.58 [2.23-82.78], p = 0.005) to attain LLDAS. Patients taking azathioprine (OR 0.67 [0.53-0.86], p = 0.001) and methotrexate (OR 0.68 [0.47-0.98], p = 0.038) were less likely to attain LLDAS. Patients taking mycophenolate mofetil were less likely to experience a flare (OR 0.79 [0.64-0.97], p = 0.025). None of the drugs was associated with a reduction in damage accrual. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a steroid-sparing benefit for most commonly used standard of care immunosuppressants used in SLE treatment, some of which were associated with an increased likelihood of attaining LLDAS, or reduced incidence of flares. It also highlights the unmet need for effective treatments in lupus.

Presentation of enthesitis-related arthritis and juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study in a pediatric and adult clinic.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) comprises a whole spectrum of chronic arthritis starting before 16 years of age. The study aims to explore the clinical and demographic descriptors, treatment, and disease progression of enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) in comparison with juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of consecutive patients in two dedicated clinics, with a single visit and retrospective case-notes review. Arthritis, enthesitis and sacroiliitis were evaluated by scoring disease activity and damage. Continuous variables were reported by median, interquartile range; categorical variables were reported by the frequency comparison of the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-three cases were included, being 23 (69.7%) with ERA. The median age at diagnosis was 12.5 y (SpA) vs. 9 y (ERA) (p < 0.01); the time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 5.5 y (SpA) vs. 1.5 y (ERA) (p < 0.03). In both groups, the predominant presentation was a single joint or < 5 lower limb joints and asymmetric involvement, with a high frequency of enthesitis. There was a higher frequency of mid-tarsal and ankle synovitis in the ERA group and hip involvement in those with SpA. The comparison of the frequency of spine symptoms at presentation, 30% SpA vs. 21.7% ERA (p = 0.7), was not significant, and radiographic progression to spinal involvement occurred in 43.5% of ERA patients. The median time for spinal progression and age at onset was 2.2 and 12 y for ERA, and 4 and 16.5 y for SpA, respectively. Activity and damage scores were not significantly different between the groups. Treatment comparison resulted in 91.3% of ERA and 100% SpA being treated, predominantly with NSAIDs in both groups, followed by DMARDs and biologics, with a higher frequency of biologics in SpA. CONCLUSION: The main differences were the late diagnoses of SpA, and the hip and spine involvement, with higher frequency of biologic treatment in juvenile-onset SpA compared to ERA.

Adherence to low-dose methotrexate in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis using a sensitive methotrexate assay.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose weekly methotrexate (MTX) is the mainstay of treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Unfortunately, a substantial part of patients has insufficient efficacy of MTX. A potential cause of this inadequate response is suboptimal drug adherence. The aim of this study was to assess MTX adherence in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients by quantification of MTX concentrations in plasma. Secondly, the association between MTX concentrations and either self-reported adherence issues, or concomitant use of biologics was examined. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study using plasma samples from juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. An ultrasensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for quantification of MTX and its metabolite 7-hydroxy-MTX in plasma. The determined MTX plasma concentrations in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients were compared with corresponding adherence limits, categorising them as either adherent or possibly non-adherent to MTX therapy. RESULTS: Plasma samples of 43 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were analysed. Adherence to MTX in this population was 88% shortly after initiation of MTX therapy and decreased to 77% after one year of treatment. Teenagers were more at risk for non-adherence (p = 0.002). We could not find an association between MTX adherence with either self-reported adherence issues, nor with the use of concomitant biological treatment (p = 1.00 and p = 0.27, respectively; Fisher's Exact). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of MTX in plasma is a feasible and objective method to assess adherence in patients using low-dose weekly MTX. In clinical practice, the use of this method could be a helpful tool for physicians to refute or support suspicion of non-adherence to MTX therapy.

Relapses of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in adulthood: A monocentric experience.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to describe a monocentric cohort of young adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), assessing the risk of relapse after transition to adult care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study and collected clinical, serological, and demographic data of young adult patients (18-30 years old) referred to the Transition Clinic of a single Italian centre between January 2020 and March 2023. Patients with systemic-onset JIA were excluded. Primary outcome was disease relapse, defined by Wallace criteria. Risk factors were analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Fifty patients with age 18-30 years old were enrolled in the study and followed for a median 30 months. The median disease duration at transition was 15 years. Twenty (40%) patients were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and 38 (76%) were on biological DMARDs through adulthood. Twenty-three patients relapsed after transitioning to adult care for a median 9-month follow-up (IQR 0-46.5). Most relapses involved the knees (69.6%). The univariate analysis identified monoarthritis (HR 4.67, CI 1.069-20.41, p value = 0.041) as the main risk factor for relapse within the first 36 months of follow-up. Early onset, ANA positivity, past and ongoing treatment with csDMARDs or bDMARDs, therapeutic withdrawal, and disease activity within 12 months before transition did not significantly influence the risk of relapse. CONCLUSION: In JIA patients, the risk of relapse after transitioning to adult care remains high, irrespective of disease subtype and treatment. The main risk factor for the early occurrence of articular activity is monoarticular involvement.

The landscape of real-world evidence of rituximab utilization and clinical outcomes in patients with cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is used to treat various conditions in cancer, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Although RTX has been used in the United States for almost 3 decades, questions remain regarding its real-world utilization and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To describe the state of observational research and real-world evidence evaluating RTX in oncology, RA, and off-label use in MS. METHODS: A broad search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL covering the period of January 2010 to June 2022. Two reviewers independently screened all identified records for each disease category (cancer, RA, MS) beginning with title review, followed by abstract, and full-text review to identify relevant publications to include in the final analysis. Data were extracted and summarized for each disease based on overall trends, similarities, and differences across included studies and stratified by disease state. RESULTS: A total of 260 studies met eligibility criteria, with 79 studies for the RA cohort, 144 for cancer, and 37 for MS. Across all disease cohorts, most studies (n = 189; 72.7%) were retrospective. 171 (65.8%) studies used hospital or electronic health record data as their data source and 65 (23.2%) used registry databases. Most studies (n = 153; 58.8%) assessed the effectiveness of RTX measured by disease-specific endpoints, followed by safety (n = 60; 23.1%), treatment patterns (n = 32; 12.3%), and descriptive analyses assessing treatment adherence and economic burden of disease (n = 16; 6.2%). Although safety was not the primary outcome for most studies, the majority of studies across all disease states still reported some form of safety measure. Conclusive statements on RTX's benefit varied across disease states, with MS having the most (n = 30; 81.1%) studies suggesting the drug's positive benefit. There were limited studies assessing RTX use, associated economic burden, and biosimilar switching. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the need for health care providers to better understand the treatment landscape and utilization of RTX, particularly in terms of patient selection, timing of initiation, and long-term outcomes. Real-world evidence can help support health care decisions and treatment using rituximab.

Energy landscape analysis and time-series clustering analysis of patient state multistability related to rheumatoid arthritis drug treatment: The KURAMA cohort study.

Rheumatoid arthritis causes joint inflammation due to immune abnormalities, resulting in joint pain and swelling. In recent years, there have been considerable advancements in the treatment of this disease. However, only approximately 60% of patients achieve remission. Patients with multifactorial diseases shift between states from day to day. Patients may remain in a good or poor state with few or no transitions, or they may switch between states frequently. The visualization of time-dependent state transitions, based on the evaluation axis of stable/unstable states, may provide useful information for achieving rheumatoid arthritis treatment goals. Energy landscape analysis can be used to quantitatively determine the stability/instability of each state in terms of energy. Time-series clustering is another method used to classify transitions into different groups to identify potential patterns within a time-series dataset. The objective of this study was to utilize energy landscape analysis and time-series clustering to evaluate multidimensional time-series data in terms of multistability. We profiled each patient's state transitions during treatment using energy landscape analysis and time-series clustering. Energy landscape analysis divided state transitions into two patterns: "good stability leading to remission" and "poor stability leading to treatment dead-end." The number of patients whose disease status improved increased markedly until approximately 6 months after treatment initiation and then plateaued after 1 year. Time-series clustering grouped patients into three clusters: "toward good stability," "toward poor stability," and "unstable." Patients in the "unstable" cluster are considered to have clinical courses that are difficult to predict; therefore, these patients should be treated with more care. Early disease detection and treatment initiation are important. The evaluation of state multistability enables us to understand a patient's current state in the context of overall state transitions related to rheumatoid arthritis drug treatment and to predict future state transitions.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different drugs in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) compared with placebo for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients, through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) or placebo directly or indirectly in JIA. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted. Data was extracted and analyzed by R with gemtc package. The treatment options were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. RESULTS: We identified 10 randomized controlled trials and analyzed 898 participants. Canakinumab (odds ratio 55.0, 95% credible intervals 2.4-67.0) was more effective than the placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no statistical significance between other drugs versus placebo in terms of the modified ACRpedi30 (P > .05). The SUCRA shows that canakinumab ranked first (SUCRA, 86.9%), anakinra ranked second (SUCRA, 77.7%), adalimumab ranked third (SUCRA, 61.9%), and placebo ranked the last (SUCRA, 6.3%). Nevertheless, there were no notable discrepancies in the occurrence of adverse events, hepatic-related adverse events, infectious adverse event, serious adverse events, and serious infection following treatment with canakinumab, anakinra, tocilizumab, rilonacept, or the placebo. Based on the clustergram of modified ACRpedi30 and adverse events, canakinumab is suggested for JIA according to the surface under SUCRAs considering the symptom and adverse events simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with JIA, canakinumab exhibited the highest likelihood of being the optimal treatment for achieving the modified ACRpedi30 response rate, and neither of the tested biological agents carried a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions on dose reduction of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The recommended dose of a rituximab course for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) consists of two infusions of 1000 mg with a 2-week interval. Evidence is growing that a lower dose could be as effective. We aimed to investigate patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions on dose reduction of rituximab. METHODS: Patients with RA treated with rituximab, and rheumatologists were invited for a qualitative study via individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited based on purposive sampling to ensure diversity. Interviews were analysed according to the principles of grounded theory and the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Sixteen patients and 13 rheumatologists were interviewed. Patients and rheumatologists perceived the benefits of rituximab dose reduction for reasons of safety and societal costs. Furthermore, available evidence for the effectiveness of lower doses was mentioned as an argument in favour, in addition to the possibility to tailor the dose based on the patients' clinical manifestations. However, patients and rheumatologists had concerns about the potential loss of effectiveness and quality of life. Moreover, some rheumatologists felt uncomfortable with dose reduction due to insufficient experience with rituximab in general. Patients and rheumatologists emphasised the importance of shared decision-making, underscoring the pivotal role of physicians in this process by explaining the reasoning behind dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Although some concerns on effectiveness were perceived, both patients and rheumatologists saw potential benefits of dose reduction in terms of safety, societal costs, and application of a personalised approach. As a result, most rheumatologists and patients showed a willingness to consider dose reduction strategies.

Prognostic models of drug-induced neutralizing antibody formation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis treated with TNF-α blockersockers.

AIM: This study aimed to construct prognostic mathematical models utilizing multifactorial regression analysis to assess the risk of developing drug-induced neutralizing antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers.

Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab in Indian Patients with Active Spondyloarthritis of Ankylosing Spondylitis or Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multicenter, Noncomparative, Open-Label, Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy for most common rheumatological diseases, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in controlled clinical trials is well-studied. This study evaluated subcutaneous (SC) golimumab in Indian patients with active spondyloarthritis (SpA) of AS or PsA in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, prospective, non-comparative, interventional, 24-week study was performed in patients (age ≥18 years) with active SpA of AS or PsA (NCT03733925). Golimumab 50 mg was given subcutaneously to the patients every 4 weeks. Safety was assessed. The proportion of patients with AS and PsA achieving ≥20% improvement in the Assessment of SpA International Society 20 (ASAS20) criteria and American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) responses, respectively, at weeks 14 and 24 were efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients enrolled (men: 78 [78.0%]; mean age: 36.7 [12.02] years), 94 (94.0%) patients completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events with golimumab were observed in 29/100 (29.0%) patients, and nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection (5.0% each) were the most common (≥5%). Deaths were not reported. At week 14, 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.7; 86.1%) of patients with AS and 84.6% (95% CI: 69.5; 94.1%) of patients with PsA achieved ASAS20 and ACR20 responses, which were sustained at week 24 (ASAS20: 66.0% [95% CI: 50.7, 79.1%]; ACR20: 93.2% [95% CI: 81.3, 98.6%]), respectively. CONCLUSION: Golimumab (50 mg) administered subcutaneously was safe and effective in Indian patients with active SpA of AS or PsA during the 24-week study period with no new safety signals.